|
The Way Forward ANDREW MCDONALD outlines the steps being taken to develop a programme of reform and modernisation of tribunals across government. The Tribunals for Users Programme was established in the Lord Chancellor's Department (LCD) in September 2001 to address tribunal reform, in the light of the Review by Sir Andrew Leggatt. Tribunals have not been systematically examined since the 1950s. Since then, administrative justice has changed out of all recognition. Today, more than 80 tribunals across government consider a million cases as year affecting issues of profound importance to individuals - for example, their liberty, their income and their children's education. There is now a powerful case for substantive change and an opportunity to improve the services offered to users. The terms of reference for the Programme were to develop and consider options for taking forward tribunal reform, building on the findings of the formal consultation exercise which ended in November; on the basis of that appraisal to recommend to Government Ministers a programme of change; and to put forward a business case in support of that programme. During our first six months, we made significant progress in developing options for reform. We analysed responses to the formal consultation exercise and consulted with a wide range of stakeholders across the tribunal community, including the senior judiciary, tribunal chairs and members, user groups and representatives from the 10 largest tribunals (1). In developing the case for change, we assembled and evaluated evidence on the quality of current tribunal services, their costs and the ability of tribunals to respond to the Government's public sector reforms.
All of the findings from this work endorsed the case for substantive change and in particular, the need to:
They comprised:
As we looked to see which option offered the best prospect of delivering substantive change and improving services to users, a number of policy proposals were considered which would further shape the new service, including:
The programme's consultation with stakeholders showed that although there are common underlying business processes, reform will need to take full account of the differences between tribunals and make the most of existing service improvement plans. The differences in the work of party v party tribunals particularly those of the Employment Tribunals Service were especially highlighted. To limit the risks associated with change, our emerging view is that reform should be implemented over time. Each tribunal should join in the reform programme at the time which is appropriate for it and planning must allow sufficient time and resource for activities such as communication, change management, organisational development and the design, piloting and rollout of new processes. This approach will also take account of individual tribunal modernisation initiatives that are already under way or are planned to start ahead of overarching reform. The way forward is a matter for collective Ministerial agreement. A bid for funding to take forward the programme of change has also been made. Once the way forward is determined, an important initial step may be the establishment of a design board with the authority to ensure that individual tribunal modernisation programmes converge with the long-term goals of tribunal reform. Agreement on the proposals is expected during the summer and the programme will then draw up plans for the next stage of its work in consultation with all stakeholders. Details of the reform and modernisation programme will be announced later in the year.
ANDREW MCDONALD is the Head of the Tribunals for Users Programme at the Lord Chancellor's Department. He can be contacted on 020 7210 1440. (1) Appeals Service, Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeals Panel, Employment Tribunals Service, Immigration Appellate Authorities, Lands Tribunal, Mental Health Review Tribunals (England), Pensions Appeal Tribunal, Special Educational Needs Tribunal (England), Social Security and Child Support Commissioners, Tax Tribunals. To limit the risks associated with change, our emerging view is that reform should be implemented over time |
|||
|
|
|||
|
©
Crown Court |
|||